Multi-tasking GPs give Google glasses new lease of life

Kat Lay in the Times July 22nd reports: Multi-tasking GPs give Google glasses new lease of life
and since I am always looking for what could be good news, NHSreality has posted.

My mother always demanded her GP to turn the screen away from him/her and look at my Mum when they consulted. Google’s glasses seem to be able to address her concerns, without reducing the efficiency of the GP consultation. I suspect GPs are dubious and the overstretched majority will reject even attempting to work with a camera next to their eyes..

Image result for healthy glasses cartoon

It’s a familiar scenario: you go to see your GP but they spend more time looking at their computer than at you. Now a futuristic solution could mean more than one pair of eyes looking at you in the consulting room.
Doctors complain that they need to start typing while their patient is still talking, because consultations last only ten minutes and the next patient is waiting.
The electronic systems favoured by NHS bodies are inefficient, they say, making it harder to have a real, human interaction with the person seeking their advice. Patients too, complain, feeling they are not being listened to.
Doctors in the United States have started wearing Google Glass, the computer built into spectacle frames with cameras, while examining patients to get round the problem.
The consultation is watched in “real time” by a medical scribe working remotely — often in India or Bangladesh — using a platform developed by Augmedix. They type up the notes for the doctor to later amend or approve.

The glasses can also display information from a patient’s notes.

Google Glass was launched in 2013 as a consumer device but failed to take off and production stopped in 2015.

Google has now quietly reinvented it for business use. Glass Enterprise Edition has longer battery life and is said to be more comfortable. Ian Shakil, the chief executive and co-founder of Augmedix, told Wired magazine that the new use was the polar opposite of Glass’s original launch.

He said: “When you hear the word Glass, you think dehumanisation, social disruption. We’re the opposite — being close to the patient; being able to put your hand on his or her shoulder to comfort them.”

Davin Lundquist, chief medical officer at Dignity Health, uses Augmedix when he sees patients. He said that it had cut the time spent typing up notes from 33 per cent of the day to 10 per cent and that interaction with patients had risen from 35 to 70 per cent.

In an interview with Popular Science Mr Shakil said that 98 per cent of patients consented to the use of Glass, and the device displayed a green light when it was recording and could switch to audio-only mode.

As well as doctors’ consulting rooms, the technology is being used on factory production lines.

NHS doctors and nurses do not yet use the devices. The technology is not completely alien to the UK, however. Queen Mary University of London’s medical school started using Google Glass in 2014. Its surgeons wore the devices as they removed cancerous tissue from the liver and bowel of a 78-year-old man in a teaching session watched live by 13,000 people around the world.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in A Personal View, Good News on by .

About Roger Burns - retired GP

I am a retired GP and medical educator. I have supported patient participation throughout my career, and my practice, St Thomas; Surgery, has had a longstanding and active Patient Participation Group (PPG). I support the idea of Community Health Councils, although I feel they should be funded at arms length from government. I have taught GP trainees for 30 years, and been a Programme Director for GP training in Pembrokeshire 20 years. I served on the Pembrokeshire LHG and LHB for a total of 10 years. I completed an MBA in 1996, and I along with most others, never had an exit interview from any job in the NHS! I completed an MBA in 1996, and was a runner up for the Adam Smith prize for economy and efficiency in government in that year. This was owing to a suggestion (St Thomas' Mutual) that practices had incentives for saving by being allowed to buy rationed out services in the following year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s