Specific tax rises are short term, not enough and ignore the big issue.. Honesty.

The charade of the election is upon us. Medical professionals know that the debate is dishonest and that all the parties are in denial. 1p on tax from my party is a gesture, but hardly enough if the whole health service is not to be rationed. Whilst most medics and nurses would like to vote Liberal (if it counted in their area) they may be so disengaged they fail to vote. The big issue is honesty – and all parties are lying. Even the Economist thinks that the Liberals have the best manifesto, but even the economist has failed to lead on rationing health care.

( The middle has fallen out of British politics – The leaders of both main parties have turned away from a decades-old vision of an open, liberal country )

Image result for lying nhs health cartoon

James Gallagher reported 6th May 2017: Lib Dems pledge 1p income tax rise to fund NHS

Hugh Pym for BBC News 18th May opines: Whose election promise adds up for the NHS?

“Billions more for the NHS,” is a familiar election battle cry.

This time, the pledges from the main political parties have been much anticipated because of the warnings about mounting pressures on the service.

Those commitments have now been made and, perhaps unsurprisingly, comparing them is like apples and pears.

BBC News on 17th May 2017 reports: Lib Dem manifesto summary: Key points at-a-glance

A programme providing voters with an “opportunity to change Britain’s future – by changing the opposition” – a choice between “the extreme and divisive Brexit that Theresa May has chosen for Britain” and a Labour Party “that has given up on opposition”.
Tim Farron’s foreword says: “I want the Liberal Democrats to be the party that holds Theresa May to account over spending on the National Health Service; our young people’s education, skills and opportunities; the protection of our precious environment; and our future relationship with Europe.”……

Image result for lying nhs health cartoon

The Guardian analysis: Liberal Democrat manifesto: the key points and analysis

Fighting hard Brexit takes centre-stage but manifesto also promises significant new investment in health, social care and education

The Telegraph today reports: Liberal Democrat manifesto for General Election 2017: Key points …

Reality Check by BBC News 5th June 2017: Reality Check: How would Lib Dems fund NHS plans?

What’s the policy?

The Liberal Democrats say they would increase NHS and social care spending in England by £6bn a year by 2022. This is money on top of the government’s existing plans.

Out of that £6bn, £2bn has been earmarked for social care – leaving an additional £4bn for the NHS.

Extra money would start to go into the health service from 2018, with the full increase taking effect from 2022.

Outside of England, it will up to the devolved governments in Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland to choose whether to spend the money on health or elsewhere.

How would it be funded?

The Lib Dems say they want an extra penny on each existing income tax band – that’s the basic, higher and additional rates. The party says this would raise £6.3bn a year.

Table shows the 1% income tax increase proposed by the Liberal Democrats

*This excludes Scotland, which has different income bands

Rather than all going into the Treasury’s coffers, this extra money would be ring-fenced so that it’s only spent on NHS and social care. This is known as a hypothecated tax.

In the longer-term, the party would replace its income tax rise with a “health and care tax”, possibly based on a reform of National Insurance contributions.

Under this new system, deductions would appear on workers’ pay-packets, setting out the proportion of tax going to the NHS and on social care.

What does it mean for pay packets?

As the independent Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) observes, the tax plans would affect all the 30 million adults who pay income tax in the UK.

That still leaves a considerable number who won’t be affected.

The IFS says 45% of adults currently pay no income tax at all, as their incomes are below the personal allowance, which currently stands at £11,500 a year.

The Lib Dems says their plans will mean that someone earning £15,000 would pay an extra £33 a year in tax, with someone on £50,000 paying an extra £383.

According to party leader Tim Farron, the policy will mean an average person paying an extra £3 a week.

“A pint of beer a week to pay for a health and social care service that will last us from cradle to grave,” Mr Farron said.

Those towards the bottom of the income scale may still stand to benefit, despite the increase in the basic rate of tax.

That’s because the Lib Dems are also planning to cancel a number of welfare cuts that are planned over the next few years.

The IFS believes the £6bn the Lib Dems expect to raise is much more certain than the extra revenue forecast by Labour’s income tax rise.

The reason, according to the IFS, is that the Lib Dem plans are less dependent on the income group at the very top.

This group is more likely to take measures to avoid paying extra tax (eg putting more money into their pension pots, leaving the country).

Previous 1p pledges

It’s not the first time that the Lib Dems have called for a 1p tax rise.

In their 1997 and 2001 manifestos, the Lib Dems pledged to put an extra penny on the basic rate of income tax to pay for their education plans.

Is this a lot of money in the context of health spending?

According to the Nuffield Trust, health spending in England – after being adjusted for inflation – is currently set to rise from £123.7bn this year to £126.5bn in 2021.

This works out, according to Nuffield Trust analysis, at an average increase of 0.75% a year above inflation.

By comparison, the Lib Dem plans work out at a 1.4% increase a year above inflation, according to separate IFS calculations.

While this is certainly more than the current spending plans imply, it is still less than the historical average.

According to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), since 1978 UK health spending has grown at an average of 3.8% a year after inflation is taken into account.

Going forward, the OBR also says that pressure on the budget will grow at 4% a year as a result of a growing and ageing population.

The inconvenient truth: NHS faces £20bn funding hole whoever wins

Image result for lying politicians health cartoon

This entry was posted in A Personal View, Political Representatives and activists, Stories in the Media on by .

About Roger Burns - retired GP

I am a retired GP and medical educator. I have supported patient participation throughout my career, and my practice, St Thomas; Surgery, has had a longstanding and active Patient Participation Group (PPG). I support the idea of Community Health Councils, although I feel they should be funded at arms length from government. I have taught GP trainees for 30 years, and been a Programme Director for GP training in Pembrokeshire 20 years. I served on the Pembrokeshire LHG and LHB for a total of 10 years. I completed an MBA in 1996, and I along with most others, never had an exit interview from any job in the NHS! I completed an MBA in 1996, and was a runner up for the Adam Smith prize for economy and efficiency in government in that year. This was owing to a suggestion (St Thomas' Mutual) that practices had incentives for saving by being allowed to buy rationed out services in the following year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s