This perverse performance management is exactly what is derided by the profession.. Why not appeal to our professionalism?

GPs should and would reduce drugs which a re potentially harmful to the elderly. However, it takes time, and persuasion in some cases to achieve the desired result. GPs are overwhelmed and overloaded, and hence they protect themselves by going part-time. Consultations with elderly multiple pathology and multiple pharmacology patients take time…. This perverse performance management is exactly what is derided by the profession.. Why not appeal to our professionalism? The emotive language of “bribery” for what is good practice is the fourth estate at it’s worst. Canada uses humour to achieve the same objective.

Image result for polypharmacy cartoon

Chris Smyth reports in the Times 1st June 2017 that :GPs will get ‘bribes’ for taking drugs from elderly

GPs will receive half the money saved when they cut the number of drugs given to elderly patients in care homes under a scheme that has been condemned by doctors’ leaders.

Bosses in Oxfordshire want to give GP surgeries a “financial incentive to reduce prescribing costs” by sharing savings from giving fewer medicines to the frail elderly. Patient leaders criticised the plan as a “bribe” and doctors said that it was wrong to focus on cost-cutting rather than patient needs.

Many experts believe that vulnerable elderly people often take too many drugs that do little good and may cause side-effects, with an estimated third of the over-75s taking more than four medicines. Last year Keith Ridge, chief pharmacist of NHS England, said that it was a scandal that a fifth of pills taken by elderly patients were pointless, with hundreds of thousands taken to hospital because medicines interacted badly with each other.

Dozens of GP surgeries in Oxfordshire have been asked by their clinical commissioning group to look at using fewer medicines without harming care, with a target of saving £2 per patient. If they achieve that, surgeries will be paid £1 per patient and get half of any further savings. The scheme aims to save at least £1.45 million.

Andrew Green, prescribing lead for the GP committee of the British Medical Association, said: “The danger here is that [bosses] should not approach it from the view to reducing costs. They should approach with a view to getting the right care for the patient.” He told the magazine Pulse, which uncovered the plans: “In frail elderly patients in care homes it is highly likely that it is a case of stopping, rather than starting, medication. So it might well be that the result is cutting costs, but that mustn’t be the aim.”

Joyce Robins, of the pressure group Patient Concern, said: “It feels a bit like a bribe. Telling GPs you can be better off financially by prescribing less to patients doesn’t seem like a good idea. You would like to think patient care was their main priority, not cost savings.”

The Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire local medical committee, which represents GPs in the area, has rejected the scheme and is urging surgeries not to agree.

Paul Roblin, the group’s chief executive, said that it was confusing and bureaucratic. “The scheme may not pass the bottom line test on workload versus reward, especially as those doing the work are not directly rewarded for the time they spend,” he wrote in a message to colleagues.

The scheme comes after controversies over arrangements in which local health chiefs paid GPs to refer fewer patients for tests and scans, including those for cancer. The BMA has criticised such payments for contaminating the doctor-patient relationship by making people question GPs’ motives.

An investigation by the BMJ this year found that GPs were being overruled by private companies that were paid by local health chiefs to stop patients being referred to hospital.

NHS England also ran a scheme that paid GPs £55 for each person given a dementia diagnosis. It was condemned as an “ethical travesty” amounting to cash for diagnosis. The number known to have the condition rose by a fifth while it was in operation.

A spokeswoman for Oxfordshire clinical commissioning group said: “The aim of the prescribing incentive scheme is to review medicines and prescribing in care homes and with the frail elderly in order to optimise medication . . . The incentive scheme will encourage practices to audit and review their prescribing in this group of patients to optimise their medicines management.” She promised safeguards against distortion of priorities using “nationally endorsed tools”.

 

The evidence – and lack of it – is important. Doctors waiting rooms and out-patients should show James McCormack’s videos..

Behemian Polypharmacy – a Utube educational video for doctors by James McCormack of UBC Pharmacology Department.

Published on 19 Feb 2014

Bohemian Polypharmacy – a parody of Queen’s classic song Bohemian Rhapsody – a song all about polypharmacy – taking more medicines than are clinically indicated.

Image result for bohemian rhapsody cartoon

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in A Personal View, Stories in the Media on by .

About Roger Burns - retired GP

I am a retired GP and medical educator. I have supported patient participation throughout my career, and my practice, St Thomas; Surgery, has had a longstanding and active Patient Participation Group (PPG). I support the idea of Community Health Councils, although I feel they should be funded at arms length from government. I have taught GP trainees for 30 years, and been a Programme Director for GP training in Pembrokeshire 20 years. I served on the Pembrokeshire LHG and LHB for a total of 10 years. I completed an MBA in 1996, and I along with most others, never had an exit interview from any job in the NHS! I completed an MBA in 1996, and was a runner up for the Adam Smith prize for economy and efficiency in government in that year. This was owing to a suggestion (St Thomas' Mutual) that practices had incentives for saving by being allowed to buy rationed out services in the following year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s