By the way… Sadly, NHS rationing was inevitable

An article/letter? by an un-named Dr in the Glasgow Herald (on press reader) is honest, but it misses the point that the rationing today is covert. It has to be overt and explicit, and known in advance, before it can be fair.

By the way… Sadly, NHS rationing was inevitable. Scottish Daily Mail – 16 Aug 2016

WHEN I became a junior doctor, the NHS was just 25 years old and we were all coming to terms with what it meant to provide free healthcare at the point of delivery.

I was becoming concerned about the growing waiting lists — a political hot potato at the time. But my father, an established anaesthetist who had worked as a battle surgeon before the creation of the NHS in 1948, warned me there would be further challenges ahead.

As he observed back then, there is only a certain amount of cake to go round, free service for all or not, so some form of rationing would be necessary.

In those days, demand for healthcare was managed by way of waiting lists. But my father warned me that, at some point, it would become politically unacceptable to have to wait for care and, once that day came, there would have to be more subtle ways of depriving the public of the care it had been promised.

One way is to make it harder for people to qualify for treatment.

And now we learn, not least from the Mail’s investigations, of the widespread restrictions on cataract operations — with three-quarters of NHS hospitals denying the surgery to all but the most visually impaired patients.

In a similar policy, joint replacement for knee arthritis is to be restricted in certain areas by tough selection criteria set by the local commissioners, while previously it was the decision of a specialist orthopaedic surgeon following referral by the patient’s GP.

The days when healthcare was governed by doctors functioning within a code of ethics are clearly over — the ministrations and cost-cutting antics of administrators and commissioning bodies are not informed by ethics.

Of course, care must be taken when spending public money on potentially expensive treatments, but the proper application of medical ethics must apply — we should strive to make decisions on the basis of individual medical need rather than blindly adhering to blanket rulings imposed from above.

And maybe now is the time to come clean, Mr Jeremy Hunt, and admit the mantra of free healthcare for all at the point of delivery is no longer something the nation can afford.

It is time to admit to rationing and accept that some will suffer — and not let it creep in by the back door.

This entry was posted in A Personal View, Political Representatives and activists, Rationing, Stories in the Media on by .

About Roger Burns - retired GP

I am a retired GP and medical educator. I have supported patient participation throughout my career, and my practice, St Thomas; Surgery, has had a longstanding and active Patient Participation Group (PPG). I support the idea of Community Health Councils, although I feel they should be funded at arms length from government. I have taught GP trainees for 30 years, and been a Programme Director for GP training in Pembrokeshire 20 years. I served on the Pembrokeshire LHG and LHB for a total of 10 years. I completed an MBA in 1996, and I along with most others, never had an exit interview from any job in the NHS! I completed an MBA in 1996, and was a runner up for the Adam Smith prize for economy and efficiency in government in that year. This was owing to a suggestion (St Thomas' Mutual) that practices had incentives for saving by being allowed to buy rationed out services in the following year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s