Doctors should expect to repay state investment with NHS service

Prof Michael Taggart believes (BMJ 2015;350:h2882) that Doctors should expect to repay state investment with NHS service. This happens elsewhere, but we get all concerned with the Human Rights Act and freedom of movement/workers. There is a small loss of liberty which is worth sacrificing for order and predictability….(Bonapartism) Doctors could repay in the form of work, or they could buy their way out.. In this way there would be no shortage In unpopular areas.

The vigorous debate instigated by Dean about the ethics of private practice1 has set me pondering what seem to be a few incongruities.

As a university based academic scientist I receive no pay for any overtime work, of which there is plenty, and I am contractually obliged to seek permission from my current employer if I wish to undertake additional salaried employment. From this setting I am, therefore, presenting the view of an outsider looking in, and in so doing, I may be blinded to some important nuances of the topic.

Firstly, UK medical graduates have benefited from an education provided by the state. It does not seem oppressive to expect doctors to repay that investment with service to the NHS. If members of the public detect an over-eagerness in doctors to undertake private practice, this may dent their confidence in the commitment of some of the profession to the NHS. Sometimes perceptions are important.

Secondly, a common argument is that having a private practice in tandem with NHS responsibilities has a positive benefit for the latter. I could be open to persuasion on this point only if, in private practice, one is caring for UK based patients and not for health tourists. Perhaps this differs across the UK.

Thirdly, if the impetus for having a private practice in addition to NHS work is not predominantly one of profit, then why take an additional salary? Perhaps there is evidence of circumstances where the extra monies from private practices are put to egalitarian uses.

Fourthly, in my position the contractual stipulation mentioned above is in place, I presume, to prevent a conflict of interest. For many in this sort of circumstance, it may seem odd if there is relatively unfettered access to private sources of income for medical work that is traded on a reputation garnered through NHS funded employment.

Passport plan for patients is rejected

Cyclists, disability wheelchairs, and all dog, cat and exotic pet owners should be insured, licensed and registered

This entry was posted in A Personal View, Consultants, General Practitioners, Medical Education, Political Representatives and activists, Professionals, Rationing, Stories in the Media on by .

About Roger Burns - retired GP

I am a retired GP and medical educator. I have supported patient participation throughout my career, and my practice, St Thomas; Surgery, has had a longstanding and active Patient Participation Group (PPG). I support the idea of Community Health Councils, although I feel they should be funded at arms length from government. I have taught GP trainees for 30 years, and been a Programme Director for GP training in Pembrokeshire 20 years. I served on the Pembrokeshire LHG and LHB for a total of 10 years. I completed an MBA in 1996, and I along with most others, never had an exit interview from any job in the NHS! I completed an MBA in 1996, and was a runner up for the Adam Smith prize for economy and efficiency in government in that year. This was owing to a suggestion (St Thomas' Mutual) that practices had incentives for saving by being allowed to buy rationed out services in the following year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s