In The Times April 29th a small insert in page 6 (not on line) reads: GP pledges are fantasy.
Rising GP shortages mean that Labour and Tory promises on more convenient appointments are a “fantasy”. Vacancy rates at practices are at 9%, up from 2% four years ago, according to research by GP magazine Pulse. Nigel Praities, the editor, said that there were not enough doctors to staff current services and politicians “need to get real”. Even Pulse does not endorse rationing! (Pulse’s alternative election manifesto) (Fantasy vs reality – why election promises of more GPs don’t add up). NHSreality agrees. Some would ask “Why should GPs vote at all when it makes so little difference and supports dishonesty? ” Chris Ham (Kings Fund) and Nigel Edwards (Nuffield Trust) in The Guardian letters comment “Parties need a dose of realism over NHS funding promises”…
Sofia Lind and Eleanor Griffiths report in Pulse 29th April: Fantasy vs reality – why election promises of more GPs don’t add up
The 2015 general election has left a legacy of outlandish promises that politicians will come to regret.
From the Conservatives’ pledge of seven-day GP opening and same-day access for the over-75s, to Labour’s guarantee of a GP in every A&E and appointments within 48 hours, the commitments suggest all the party leaders have completely lost touch with reality.
And no matter which party wins, it will see its fantasy bubble pricked. Because all these promises rely on one thing: more GPs.
The Conservatives say they will supply 5,000 new GPs over the next Parliament. Labour and UKIP have topped this with 8,000. The Liberal Democrats made the extraordinary claim that they would be able to ‘fund 38,000 more GPs’ – although when challenged by Pulse they admitted this was just an ‘illustrative’ figure and 5,000 was more likely.
But all this is pure cloud cuckoo land. The number of GPs per head of population is falling and new data gathered by Pulse show that practices across the country are finding it almost impossible to recruit.
Morale and workload
One in 10 full-time-equivalent GP partner positions is vacant – up almost 50% since last year – and a fifth of practices are waiting a year or more to fill a vacancy. GPs say this is putting huge pressure on them, but the future looks even bleaker.
The results of a recent BMA survey suggested a third of GPs plan to retire within the next five years.
At the other end of the scale, medical graduates are shunning general practice, due to concerns over morale and workload. This year, 30% of postgraduate GP training places are unfilled after the first round of recruitment, compared with only 9% at the same time in 2013.
And this situation has developed despite promises in 2010 from the then health secretary Andrew Lansley of a major boost to the number of GPs in training. This has patently failed to materialise and, in any case, new GPs take 10 years to train, so none of the promised new recruits will add to the tally being pledged by the main parties.
The various health spokespersons have mumbled that a focus on ‘personalised care’ and a boost to NHS funding will attract new GPs. But GP leaders point out that none of them has come up with any viable plan to boost GP numbers.
The promise of more NHS funding is an illusion. Labour has promised a £2.5bn cash injection every year, but this looks puny compared with the £8bn increase in funding demanded by NHS chief executive Simon Stevens in his Five Year Forward View.
Both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats have committed to the £8bn per year, but Mr Stevens’s calculations are predicated on the NHS itself delivering unprecedented ‘efficiency’ improvements of 2% to 3% a year.
But figures published recently by the Health Foundation show that crude productivity fell in the NHS by almost 1% a year in both 2012/13 and 2013/14. The kind of savings Mr Stevens wants are going to be a huge ask, even without the extended access to GPs promised by politicians.
NHS England has agreed a workforce plan with the GPC and the RCGP, but the £10m plan – including golden handshakes for new recruits into underdoctored areas and a simplified process to encourage retired GPs and expats to return to UK general practice – is widely regarded as a drop in the ocean.
GPC education and training subcommittee chair Dr Krishna Kasaraneni says the political parties must commit to fund GP services for the long term, rather than funding short-term political follies.
He says: ‘I have seen no pledges that have offered anything meaningful. To say “we will produce 5,000 or 8,000 extra GPs in five years” when it takes 10 years to put a person through foundation and GP training doesn’t add up. Unless somebody has a Back to the Future DeLorean they can use to manipulate time, I don’t see how they can create that many GPs in that short time. What is missing is detail. They are coming out with blank, high-level statements that are either a play on words or simply political games.’
Dr Kasaraneni adds: ‘What we need is not bailouts, but sustainable, long-term investment. How are we ever going to be able to provide seven-day access or appointments to everybody within 48 hours, without the workforce for it? This is nonsense and not the kind of promise they should be making.’
RCGP chair Dr Maureen Baker says a focus on returners and retainers is crucial: ‘We have a chronic shortage of GPs across the UK. Whichever government comes into power after the election needs to tackle this as a priority.
‘We have a plan – our joint 10-point plan that we launched with NHS England, Health Education England and the BMA – to build the GP workforce. Employing 8,000 more GPs by 2020 will undoubtedly be challenging, but our analyses suggest it will be possible with maximum effort to recruit, retain and return.’
The new induction and returner scheme, launched in late March, does make it easier for trained GPs who have taken a career break to return to front-line patient care in the UK – giving practices that take on returners an £8k annual grant.
The RCGP has stepped up its efforts to sell general practice to trainees – although a YouTube video stating it was the ‘best time in a generation to become a GP’ proved controversial – and NHS England has even resorted to advertising in Australia to tempt GP expats to come back home.
But Dr Baker adds: ‘So far during the election campaign we have heard a lot of pledges from all political parties about how they will “tackle” general practice and provide more weekend and evening access to our services. These sound good, but without more GPs, more practice staff and significant investment in general practice, they are meaningless.’
And all of this is cold comfort for GPs struggling to recruit right now. Dr Raghunandan Vedapanakal, a GP in Whitehaven, Cumbria, said his practice had been two GPs short for two years, with 13 GPs covering 24,000 patients.
He says: ‘We are in a rural area and there is a lack of GPs because of a national crisis. GPs are taking early retirement due to pension reforms, work stress and too much meddling by CCGs and the Government. There is increasing demand from an ageing population, stagnant or decreasing income, GPs emigrating and 12-hour working days.’
GP Dr Imogen Bloor has had to close her practice in Islington, north London, after finding it impossible to recruit new GPs.
She says: ‘We have tried our utmost to find a way of continuing to provide high-quality care for our patients, but we feel unable to take the practice forward.’
If practices are to be expected to open longer, or guarantee appointments within two days, the new occupant of Richmond House will have to supply an awful lot more GPs – and soon.
Additional reporting by Eleanor Bley Griffiths.
Sofia Lind reports the research: GP vacancy rate at highest ever, with 50% rise in empty posts
GP Magazine editorial “What the election means for GPs” – at the time it’s too close to call reads:
So far, perhaps the most interesting development is that Labour leader Ed Miliband has surprised many by performing better than anticipated.
The future of general practice is one of the issues on which the two main political parties differ. While the Tories would have GPs at the helm of CCGs controlling a large chunk of the NHS budget, Labour would pool budgets and link commissioners and providers under health and wellbeing boards to develop integrated care organisations.
Labour has been questioning the future of independent contractor status, but there are no indications yet that it would ring its death knell.
What might be more concerning for GPs is an area where the Conservatives and Labour agree: access. The Tories are pushing for 8am to 8pm access seven days a week for all patients by 2020, with Labour guaranteeing 48-hour access.
The Tories want 5,000 more GPs and Labour, 8,000. The question on many GPs’ lips will be, how will all this be possible?
With the possibility of the election of a minority government, there could even be a chance that the policies of minor parties (the SNP, Lib Dems, UKIP or the Greens) could prove crucial.
Our website, GPonline, will have live updates after 7 May on how GPs up for election fared, including Dr Louise Irvine, who is standing against health secretary Jeremy Hunt, and what the results mean for GPs.
The only predictable thing about this election is its unpredictability. Who will be in 10 Downing Street when your 18 May edition of GP is published?