Iatrogenesis. High-risk cardiac patients do better if doctor is away

Kat Lay in the Times 24th December 2014 has an interesting article which might help our profession reflect on iatrogenesis. The Numbers and the Power are large, so what are the confounding factors? High-risk cardiac patients do better if doctor is away

cartoon1

High-risk cardiac arrest patients who are admitted to hospital are less likely to die within a month if doctors are away at medical conferences, a study has suggested.

Research has found that 10 per cent fewer high-risk patients with cardiac arrest died within 30 days if they were admitted to a teaching hospital while scientific meetings were on.

According to the study, 60 per cent of such patients died within 30 days, compared with 70 per cent of those admitted on non-meeting days. Anupam Jena, the senior author, said: “That’s a tremendous reduction in mortality, better than most of the medical interventions that exist to treat these conditions.”

The researchers found that some intensive procedures were performed less often during meeting dates than outside meeting dates and speculated that doctors who did not attend conferences might be more risk-averse.

They also said that doctors might be reluctant to perform intensive procedures on a colleague’s patients while he or she was out of town.

Dr Jena said that the study might illuminate “grey areas” in how patients were treated, and “suggest ways we can provide better care for those high-risk patients”.

The study made clear that the phenomenon applied specifically to high-risk heart failure and cardiac arrest patients, not heart-attack patients or low-risk patients.

The paper, published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine, compared similar groups of patients treated at hospitals during meetings by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology, and on matched dates immediately surrounding those meetings.

Survival rates at teaching hospitals went up for high-risk heart failure and cardiac arrest patients while those meetings were taking place.

However, there was no difference for high-risk heart attack patients or low-risk patients. There was also no change in mortality rates for patients with any of the conditions in non-teaching hospitals. The researchers said that this could be because teaching hospital doctors might be more likely to attend meetings.

“The evidence suggests that a less-is-more approach might be best for higher-risk patients with these conditions,” said Dr Jena.

Need to know. To improve health care, governments need to use the right data.

Graduate nurses increase patients’ survival chances

Americans hold keys to London’s hospitals for the rich and famous

Schizophrenia: Talking therapies ‘effective as drugs’

Truthfulness and Honesty with patients: Surgeons and Staff should be swabbed for superbugs – same as the patients

Stethoscopes ‘more contaminated’ than doctors’ hands

CBT questioned if used with drugs, so why not ration by offering choice?

The nation hooked on prescription medicines – no more than many others actually..

Hospital ‘superbug’ not monitored by government

 

 

This entry was posted in A Personal View, Stories in the Media on by .

About Roger Burns - retired GP

I am a retired GP and medical educator. I have supported patient participation throughout my career, and my practice, St Thomas; Surgery, has had a longstanding and active Patient Participation Group (PPG). I support the idea of Community Health Councils, although I feel they should be funded at arms length from government. I have taught GP trainees for 30 years, and been a Programme Director for GP training in Pembrokeshire 20 years. I served on the Pembrokeshire LHG and LHB for a total of 10 years. I completed an MBA in 1996, and I along with most others, never had an exit interview from any job in the NHS! I completed an MBA in 1996, and was a runner up for the Adam Smith prize for economy and efficiency in government in that year. This was owing to a suggestion (St Thomas' Mutual) that practices had incentives for saving by being allowed to buy rationed out services in the following year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s